There is often the initial perception, by
those who do not know much about computers in schools, that
computers will replace teachers. This is probably based on
the experiences in industrial training, where computer-based
training programmes and simulators have replaced trainers
with varying degrees of success. If a teacher can be replaced
by a computer, they should be, because that would be a very
inadequate teacher. You may argue that teachers are necessary
to maintain discipline and organise learning. Outcomes-based
education does place the teacher in new roles and it does
place more responsibility on the learner to become involved.
As we saw in the previous activity, computers can play a role
to support learners in new roles.
In focusing on the teacher, we are faced
with two issues:
- the role of the teacher teaching about
ICT (which we will discuss in Activity 4 and 5)
- the role of the teacher teaching with
ICT (which we will discuss in Activity 5 and 6)
Do teachers over teach?
At face value two pieces of research have
shown that people (and especially young people) have the potential
to learn a lot more informally than teachers are prepared
to acknowledge. We say "at face value" because it
would be an error to conclude that learners do not need teachers.
However teachers do need to re-assess what they do in the
act of "teaching". Teaching is often described by
teachers themselves as 'transferring knowledge to the learner'.
If this is all that teaching is about computers could probably
do a fairly good job of replacing the teacher. In this activity
you will consider this research about informal learning and
re-assess your roles as a teacher of ICT skills.
Before you read about Vygotsky's spontaneous
learning, prepare to reflect on its most important message
to you. What does he suggest should be the role of schooled
learning? How could we make schooled learning more effective?
What are the key roles of the teacher? Click
here to read about Vygotsky's spontaneous learning
|