How well do learners remember what they learn
at school? A view shared by many is that much of what we learn in
school is forgotten soon after it has been taught. You may have
probably experienced the same thing, where you don’t remember
much of what you may have studied in a course. Up to this point,
the focus has been on a general explanation of how people attend
to, encode, store, and retrieve information. In other words, we
have focused on some of the most important aspects of thinking.
Much of the research in the last twenty years has focused on how
much knowledge individuals have about their own thought processes
and the significance of this knowledge for learning. We refer to
this as metacognition – or ‘thinking
about your own thinking’. While cognition refers to the way
in which information is processed, metacognition refers to what
we know about those operations and how they might be used to achieve
a learning goal. Flavell in Biehler and Snowman (1997, p332) puts
it this way:
I am engaging in metacognition...if I notice
that I am having more trouble learning A than B; if it strikes
me that I should double check C before accepting it as a fact;
if it occurs to me that I had better scrutinize each and every
alternative in any multiple-choice type task situation before
deciding which one is the best one; if I become aware that I am
not sure what the experimenter wants me to do; if I sense that
I had better make a note of D because I may forget it; if I think
to ask someone about E to see if I have it right.
Flavell’s three part classification scheme
is useful in understanding this concept better. This classification
scheme includes: knowledge of person variables, task variables,
and strategy variables. Examples of each are as follows:
- Knowledge of person variables: knowing that
you are better at learning essays than mathematical concepts.
- Task variables: knowing that you have difficulty
understanding extracts which are long and have difficult, unfamiliar
words.
- Strategy variables: knowing that you will understand
a text better if you first skim through it to determine its length
and difficulty.
Research has shown that younger children know
very little about their own cognitive processes, when and how to
use them. Learners in primary school do not analyze learning tasks,
make plans for learning, use strategies to help their memory and
understanding or monitor their progress. The view is that they do
not (or cannot) understand how doing these things benefits their
learning. As children grow and develop and begin to experience more
complex information, they begin to develop a greater awareness of
their metacognitive knowledge. Teachers can assist learners by helping
them learn to use their metacognitive knowledge.
A learning strategy is a general
plan that a learner develops for achieving a learning
goal (like achieving an A on the next test). It will provide an
outline of what needs to be done to achieve this goal, where and
when it will be done. A learning tactic, on the
other hand, is a specific technique (like note taking or summarizing)
that a learner will use to achieve an outcome (like understand the
information processing model and relate it to learning). Learning
tactics are integrally linked to learning strategies. For example,
if you wanted to recall the parts of this section word for word,
you might use a learning tactic that would enable you to recall
each paragraph accurately and completely. However, if you wanted
to apply what you learn in this section to classroom teaching and
learning, then you would use a learning tactic that would help you
understand the main ideas of each paragraph.
Self-activity 1.6
Quiz
Use metacognition to think about how you
learn. Are you a tactical learner?
Write yes or no in answer to the following questions.
When you learn do you:
-draw up a learning plan ?
-skim the text for main ideas?
-write questions in the margin?
-underline or highlight main ideas?
-make notes or summaries?
-draw mindmaps?
-compare ideas?
-use mnemonics to assist memorization?
-make associations between previous and new knowledge?
-monitor how your plan and tactics are working?
-can you think of other ideas you have to assist your learning?
If you answered yes to all the above questions
you are a tactical learner.
-Do you teach your learners how to use tactics in learning?
If you answered yes to the last question
then you are also a tactical educator. |
Helping learners become strategic learners
In this sub-section, we will think about some
of the tips we may have picked up from the explanation of the information-processing
model.
Self-activity 1.7
(30 Mins)
- Re-read the section on environmental
stimuli and the SR. Which two processes are important here?
How might we as educators assist learners to focus on what
we believe is important for them?
- Now re-read the section on STM and WM.
What might we do to help learners to use their STM/WM better?
- Finally, re-read the section on LTM.
What hints are there for exercises we can do with learners
to assist them to store important information?
|
Planning and presenting a well organized and relevant
lesson is also of great
importance. To enable us to plan our own learning, and that of our
learners, we
need to keep in mind the following six elements which make up a
learning strategy:
Learners often resort to rote learning (like reading
a chapter or section repeatedly so as to memorise it), simple organizational
schemes (like outlining), and various devices (like marking important
ideas). These encoding techniques are effective for certain types
of learning, but are not helpful when the nature of the task changes.
This is because learners are not taught how to effectively use their
cognitive abilities. We describe these in a little more detail below.
Metacognition: We have already
discussed the importance of knowing how we think and how our thought
processes affect our academic performance. In order to be effective
in our learning, we need to be able to analyze the learning situation,
formulate a learning plan, skillfully implement appropriate learning
tactics, regularly monitor our progress, and modify the things that
do not work. In addition, we need to know why the above steps are
necessary, when each should be carried out, and how prepared we
are to execute these steps.
Analysis: If a plan is to be
workable, it must be based on relevant information. The strategic
learner needs to ask questions such as what, when, why, where, who
and how. These will help the learner identify:
- the material that must be learned (what,
when, where).
- the type of task one is confronted with
or nature of the test (why).
- personal characteristics (who).
- useful learning tactics and activities
(how).
Planning: Once you have tackled
the above tasks satisfactorily, you are ready to formulate a learning
plan. You might say something like the following:
- I have to study and understand the theories
of learning within the next two weeks (the material to be learned).
- I will have to compare and contrast
the principles and theories proposed by the behaviourist, cognitive
and social cognitive theorists (nature of the task related to
the outcome on p.1).
- I am good at identifying main ideas
and summarizing the key points from a text but I cannot concentrate
for long periods (your strengths and weaknesses).
- I can use skimming to get the main ideas
of the text, make notes of important details and use self-questioning
to enhance my understanding of what I am studying ( nature of
techniques and learning activities).
Armed with this knowledge, you may decide to:
divide the unit into smaller sections which will take you not longer
than half an hour to read, make notes as you read, ask yourself
self-generated questions which help you compare and contrast ideas,
and perhaps repeat this sequence several times (rehearsal) until
you feel confident that you know the material well.
Implementation: Once you have
formulated a plan, you need to implement each of the elements skillfully.
If you use learning tactics poorly, or have a lack of knowledge
about what conditions make for effective use of tactics, then even
a thorough analysis and well-designed plan will not work.
Monitoring the plan: It is necessary
to evaluate and establish how well the chosen tactics are working.
The following tactics can be used to monitor learning effectiveness:
writing summaries, giving an oral presentation, working on practical
problems, and answering questions. In class, discuss your ideas
and your understanding of material with other students or your class
tutor in order to assess it.
Modification: If your attempts
at understanding or remembering certain information are unsuccessful,
then you will need to re-evaluate and modify the analysis. This
will obviously result in changes in the plan and implementation.
Types of Tactics: There are two
categories of learning tactics based on what the basic purpose of
the tactic is:
- Memory-directed tactics
are tactics that help to produce accurate storage and retrieval
of information. Rehearsal and mnemonic devices (codes to help
memorizing) are examples of memory-directed tactics.
- Comprehension-directed tactics are
techniques which facilitate understanding of the meaning of ideas
and their connection to each other. Examples include note-taking
and self-questioning.
Self Questioning can be a valuable
learning tactic, especially as learners are expected to demonstrate
much of what they know by answering oral or written test questions.
The key to using questions effectively is to recognize that different
types of questions make different cognitive demands. Some questions
require word-for-word recall or recognition of simple facts and
details. If an exam stresses factual recall, then it may be useful
for learners to generate questions of the type which might be asked,
while studying. If questions assess comprehension, application,
or drawing together of main ideas, then learners need to generate
different questions for these tasks.
The following play an important role in the effectiveness
of self-questioning:
- The amount of prior knowledge the learner
has about the topic of the passage. If a learner knows a lot about
a topic, it will be easier for him/her to formulate questions
that reflect factual knowledge, comprehension of main ideas, similarities
and differences among different ideas, and so on.
- The amount of metacognitive knowledge
the learner has developed. A learner has to be aware of, for example,
the types of questions that could be asked (such as questions
dealing with knowledge level, comprehension level, or application
level) and the reasons for asking them, before he/she can effectively
engage in self-questioning.
- The clarity of instructions. Learners
need to be given clear and detailed instructions on how to write
good questions of a particular nature.
- The instructional format. Learners should
be encouraged to work in small cooperative groups in which they
practice and evaluate each other’s questions.
- The amount of practice the learner engages
in. Learners should be given as much practice as possible in writing
questions which develop high proficiency.
- The length of practice sessions. Each
practice session should be long enough for all learners to comfortably
read a passage and think of good questions. Often, teachers are
unrealistic in their expectations when they give learners time
to read an extract, usually because of time limitations.
A Summary of this section’s key
learning points
- Learners need to learn how to learn,
they need to become aware of their own cognitive processes.
- The Information Processing Model explains
the flow of information through various components and processes.
- Helping learners learn by developing
Strategies for effective learning and tactics for remembering
information.
|