Adapted from the Official Multimedia Mania Rubric
for Use by Registered Contestants.
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
| Story Board or Planning Sheet |
Story board is incomplete and lacks necessary URL's, formats,
and resources to complete project. |
Story board is incomplete and lacks necessary URL's, formats,
and resources to complete project. |
Story board is not complete. Includes few assigned elements
or planned formats, necessary URL's, and resources. |
Story board is complete. Includes all assigned elements,
in addition to planned formats, necessary URL's, and resources.
|
|
| Organization of Content |
No logical sequence of information; menus and paths to information
are not evident. |
Some logical sequence of information, but menus and paths
are confusing or flawed. |
Logical sequence of information.
Menus and paths to more information are clear and direct.
|
Logical, intuitive sequence of information.
Menus and paths to all information are clear and direct.
|
|
| Originality |
Sources have not been properly cited and permissions have
not been received. This project does not qualify for Multimedia
Mania. |
Some sources have not been properly cited and all permissions
have not been received. This project
does not qualify for Multimedia Mania. |
Most sources are properly cited according to MLA style; Permissions
to use any graphics from commercial web pages or other sources
have been received, printed, and saved for future reference.
|
All sources are properly cited according to MLA style; Permissions
to use any graphics from commercial web pages or other sources
have been received, printed, and saved for
future reference. |
|
| Format and Platform Transferability |
The stack, presentation, or web page plays only on either
Mac or PC. There
are problems with
the operation of some files and the project is not cross-platform.
|
The stack, presentation, or web page plays best on either
Mac or PC. There
are problems with
the operation of some files and the project is not cross-platform.
|
Most of the stack, presentation, or web page plays easily
on both Mac and PC. Although there are minor problems
with a few files, care has been taken in naming files, selecting
technologies, or creating enhancements to produce a final product
that is cross-platform. |
The stack, presentation, or web page plays easily on both
Mac and PC. Care
has been taken in naming files, selecting technologies, or creating
enhancements to produce a final product that is cross-platform.
|
|
| Subject Knowledge |
Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing,
incorrect or flawed |
Some subject knowledge is evident. Some information is confusing,
incorrect or flawed. |
Subject knowledge is evident in much of the product. Information
is clear, appropriate, and correct. |
Subject knowledge is evident throughout. (more than required)
All information is clear, appropriate, and correct. |
|
| Graphical Design |
Exaggerated emphasis upon graphics and special effects weakens
the message and interferes with the communication of content
and ideas |
Graphical and multimedia elements accompany content but there
is little sign of mutual reinforcement. There is no attention
paid to visual design criteria such as balance, proportion,
harmony and restraint. There is some tendency toward random
use of graphics. |
Design elements and content combine effectively to deliver
a high impact message with the graphics and the words reinforcing
each other. |
The combination of multimedia elements with words and ideas
takes communication and persuasion to a very high level, superior
to what could be accomplished with either alone. The mixture
brings about synergy and dramatic effects which reach the intended
audience. |
|
| Mechanics |
Presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has three or more misspellings and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has fewer than two misspellings and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
|
| Screen Design |
Screens are either confusing and cluttered or barren and stark.
Buttons or navigational tools are absent or confusing |
Screens are difficult to navigate, but some buttons and navigational
tools work. Users can navigate a few screens. |
Screens contain adequate navigational tools and buttons. Users
can progress through screens in a logical path to find information.
|
Screens contain all necessary navigational tools and buttons.
Users can progress intuitively through screens in a logical
path to find information. |
|
| Use of Enhancements |
No video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are present or use of
these tools is inappropriate. |
Limited video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are present. In
most instances, use of these tools is appropriate |
Some Video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are used
appropriately to entice users to learn and to enrich
the experience. In some cases, clips are either too long or
too short to be meaningful. |
Appropriate amounts of Video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are
used effectively to entice users to learn and to enrich the
experience. Clips are long enough convey meaning without being
too lengthy. |
|
| Teamwork |
One or two people did all or most of the work. |
Most team members participated in some aspect of the work,
but workloads varied. |
Most team members contributed their fair share of the work.
|
The work load was divided and shared equally by all team
members. |
|
| Content/Resource Requirements: depth and breadth of the assignment,
number and type of sources required, types of media, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Technical Requirements: Number of cards,
graphics, animations, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|