This rubric is adapted from a framework
to apply the ThinkQuest evaluation criteria. It will therefore
apply to websites which have been developed with the intention
of being a learning resource, but it could be selectively
used for all web projects.
The educational value
of the project
- Evaluate the importance of the educational
objectives of the project and its effectiveness in meeting
those objectives.
Give this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The educational objectives addressed have limited
relevance to the age and grade-level of the target
audience. |
The Project
has some educational value and does a moderately effective
job addressing a set of educational objectives that
have relevance to students. |
The Project
has strong educational value and clearly and effectively
engages students in its designed learning activities.
|
0
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Evaluate the extent to which the Project
fosters the "Internet Style" of learning - an
interactive, participatory, collaborative style that encourages
students to explore the Internet's timely resources and
create new relationships broadening the community in which
they live.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The Project does not foster and encourage active sharing
and collaboration by users; there may be a "guest
book" but the team is the only source of ideas,
views and experiences. |
Users of the Project actively
share information and views through this Project. |
Users participate in the
learning process and are able to explore beyond their
own communities. User may participate by contributing
to the project. |
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Evaluate the quality of the contents
of the Project, including the accuracy, completeness and
the ability to express ideas clearly.
Give this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The Project resembles the direct transfer of information
from other media (e.g. textbooks, pamphlets, magazines)
onto the Web. Information contains numerous or fundamental
errors, Project presents information as original when
it is not. The content is weak and/or unorganised.
|
Information
presented is generally accurate and any errors are
not substantive. The Project has reasonable content
and presents that content in an average manner. Some
ideas are expressed, but there is also direct transfer
of information evident. |
Information
is presented in a clear and accurate way. Team members
have
thoroughly reported on their topic and presented
their knowledge in an interesting and creative manner.
Ideas expressed are original and complex, with sound
support from information sources. |
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Have the students provided appropriate and complete attributions
for work done by others
Give this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
Citations are consistently missing, credits are incomplete.
|
Project may be
missing very minor citations, but the Project is intellectually
honest. |
References and
sources are cited properly, credits reflect all work
contributed by others |
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical quality of the project
- Evaluate the technical quality of the
Project. Is it reliable, easy to use, consistent, self-checking,
robust, and well performing on a range of browsers and platforms?
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
Many links fail, users can "crash" the Project,
multimedia connections don't work, it is easy to "get
lost" in the pages, it requires a specialised browser
and/or platform. | Users can navigate easily
throughout the Project and use it effectively with the
instructions provided. Not all pages work with all browsers
and platforms, and some links may have failed. | The Project is intuitively
easy to navigate and use, generates no errors, all links
and multimedia connections work, performs well on different
browsers and platforms at different speeds, and will
scale well as usage grows. |
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Evaluate the imagination, innovation,
graphic design, uniformity and artistic presentation of
the Project and its material.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The graphic design is unappealing and the identity of
the collection of documents is lost by lack of uniformity.
|
The team has taken advantage
of the strengths and capabilities of the Web to create
a new presentation of information and materials, the
pages are attractive and some uniformity exists. | The Project is original,
exemplifies excellent graphic design and uniformity,
and uses the many capabilities of the Web to create
an engaging, contagious and fun learning environment
for its users. |
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of the project results in the project
becoming more valuable
- Evaluate how the Project allows users
to contribute and participate by sharing ideas, views, experiences
and data with each other via the Project.
Give this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The
Project contains information that is static, repeated
visits to this site will not provide any further insight
into the topic.
There
is no opportunity for users to participate. |
The Project provides users
with a limited opportunity to participate, but does
not fully exploit the interactive nature of the internet..
|
The Project
creatively exploits the interactive nature of the internet.
The
Project has accomplished the goal of encouraging
others to contribute information that increases the
value of the site for all users. Users are able to
interact and additional visits will provide the user
with increasing information and knowledge. |
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project
is likely to be used by other students
- What is the likelihood that the Project
will be heavily used by students due to its appealing nature,
educational effectiveness, originality, appropriateness
and clarity?
Give this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
There seems to
be little likelihood that this Project will be used
by students in the future. |
The Project is sufficiently
engaging and/or effective that it is likely to be used
by students in the future. |
The Project is so original,
appealing, appropriate, clear and effective that it
is likely the Project will enjoy repeated use by students
in the future. |
0
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|