This rubric is adapted from a framework to apply
the ThinkQuest evaluation criteria. It will therefore apply to web
sites which have been developed with the intention of being a learning
resource, but it could be selectively used for all web projects.
The educational value of the project
Evaluate the importance of the educational objectives
of the project and its effectiveness in meeting those objectives.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The
educational objectives addressed have limited relevance
to the age and grade-level of the target audience. |
The
Project has some educational value and does a moderately
effective job addressing a set of educational objectives
that have relevance to students. |
The
Project has strong educational value and clearly and effectively
engages students in its designed learning activities. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate the extent to which the Project fosters
the "Internet Style" of learning - an interactive, participatory,
collaborative style that encourages students to explore the Internet's
timely resources and create new relationships broadening the community
in which they live.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The
Project does not foster and encourage active sharing and
collaboration by users; there may be a "guest book"
but the team is the only source of ideas, views and experiences. |
Users
of the Project actively share information and views through
this Project. |
Users
participate in the learning process and are able to explore
beyond their own communities. User may participate by contributing
to the project. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate the quality of the contents of
the Project, including the accuracy, completeness and the ability
to express ideas clearly.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The
Project resembles the direct transfer of information from
other media (e.g. textbooks, pamphlets, magazines) onto
the Web. Information contains numerous or fundamental errors.
Project presents information as original when it is not.
The content is weak and/or unorganized. |
Information
presented is generally accurate and any errors are not substantive.
The Project has reasonable content and presents that content
in an average manner. Some ideas are expressed, but there
is also direct transfer of information evident. |
Information
is presented in a clear and accurate way. Team members have
thoroughly reported on their topic and presented their knowledge
in an interesting and creative manner. Ideas expressed are
original and complex, with sound support from information
sources. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have the students provided appropriate and
complete attributions for work done by others.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
Citations
are consistently missing, credits are incomplete. |
Project
may be missing very minor citations, but the Project is
intellectually honest. |
References
and sources are cited properly, credits reflect all work
contributed by others |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical quality of the project
Evaluate the technical quality of the project.
Is it reliable, easy to use, consistent, self-checking, robust,
and does it perform well on a range of browsers and platforms?
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
Many
links fail, users can "crash" the Project, multimedia
connections don't work, it is easy to "get lost"
in the pages, it requires a specialized browser and/or platform. |
Users
can navigate easily throughout the Project and use it effectively
with the instructions provided. Not all pages work with
all browsers and platforms, and some links may have failed. |
The
Project is intuitively easy to navigate and use, generates
no errors, all links and multimedia connections work, performs
well on different browsers and platforms at different speeds,
and will scale well as usage grows. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate the imagination, innovation, graphic
design, uniformity and artistic presentation of the project and
its material.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The
graphic design is unappealing and the identity of the collection
of documents is lost by lack of uniformity. |
The
team has taken advantage of the strengths and capabilities
of the Web to create a new presentation of information and
materials, the pages are attractive and some uniformity
exists. |
The
Project is original, exemplifies excellent graphic design
and uniformity, and uses the many capabilities of the Web
to create an engaging, contagious and fun learning environment
for its users. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of the project
results in the project becoming more valuable
Evaluate how the project allows users to contribute
and participate by sharing ideas, views, experiences and data with
each other via the project.
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
The
project contains information that is static, repeated visits
to this site will not provide any further insight into the
topic. There is no opportunity for users to participate. |
The
project provides users with a limited opportunity to participate,
but does not fully exploit the interactive nature of the
internet. |
The
project creatively exploits the interactive nature of the
internet. The project has accomplished the goal of encouraging
others to contribute information that increases the value
of the site for all users. Users are able to interact and
additional visits will provide the user with increasing
information and knowledge. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project is likely
to be used by other students
What is the likelihood of the project being heavily
used by students due to its appealing nature, educational effectiveness,
originality, appropriateness and clarity?
Give
this project 0-3 if: |
Give
this project 4-7 if: |
Give
this project 8-10 if: |
There
seems to be little likelihood that this project will be
used by students in the future. |
The
project is sufficiently engaging and/or effective that it
is likely to be used by students in the future. |
The
project is so original, appealing, appropriate, clear and
effective that it is likely the project will enjoy repeated
use by students in the future. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|